Talk:La Casa de Papel
New review
Despite its obvious flaws and a few irritating moments, I give this series a perfect five stars. The first few episodes left me slightly confused: I couldn't understand why I kept watching, following only someone's advice and hoping for something truly gripping. Heist stories aren't my thing to begin with: I find it difficult to sympathize with robbers, especially those who use hostages as tools. However, such a high rating isn't due to the plot or personal predispositions, but to the exceptional skill of the creators. They masterfully manipulate the viewer's perception, evoking genuine emotions. At one point, I caught myself genuinely empathizing with these seemingly simple and less-than-successful criminals.
A surprising upheaval of the usual moral compass occurs, where notions of good and evil begin to reverse themselves. What was initially perceived as unconditional evil suddenly takes on new nuances. And the robbers themselves unexpectedly become a symbol of protest against the system, which leaves a strong impression. This level of storytelling deserves the highest praise.
While the series sometimes feels a bit drawn-out, it has an incredible quality—it firmly holds the viewer's attention. Ultimately, the entire story proves worth the time. Of course, there are some annoying characters: first, it's Tokyo, then Arturito, and then one of the supporting characters—creating a kind of endless cycle. The antagonist arc in seasons three through five is particularly interesting. Here, the writers explore the theme of power as a phenomenon that is sometimes much more greedy and cruel than the criminals themselves. The characters of the system are imbued with traits of deception, manipulation, and a willingness to resort to violence to achieve their goals. But if you don't dwell on the series' weak points, you can truly enjoy watching it.